Category Archives: English

English content

The SELF:LESS

To have without owning.

To nurture. Empowering, enabling, allowing others to flourish without being part of the picture. Subtract yourself from it. Save your words, spare your ear. Remove the ego.

To hold without seizing,

the void that has taken up the shape of you

warm reminder

Discreet, tip-toeing, offering, not expecting anything.

Embracing the absence,

like a prism your light through me

I’ll cry your colors in and out

Holding your hands when you don’t know it, helping you out when you need it, comforting when you’re sad, the cat on your lap, that sleeps peacefully at your side – you’ll never know I’m there – I’ll keep your heart warm and your mind free. Don’t mind me, don’t see me. Go happy on your way, I’ll sweep the stones before your feet.  I’ll be the tree that gives you shadow and safety. The coffee that warms you up and the water that refreshes you. You won’t ever hear about myself.

Renounce the conquest

call back the army

branch out leaves and buds

take my fruit if you want it

to feed you will be my honor

have it for free

Delicate, shy, prudent, slow and careful, and yet so reckless. The patience of a gardener. Humble, bow to the ground, proffer up your heart on the palm of your hands.

The fading dream

I want a story, built memories
accumulated places, smiles, sun streams through lashes
be allowed to cherish
be cherished in return.
I feel, I feel all the time
it’s not just melancholy
invisible strings tying me to all
tugging at my heart
an itch I cannot scratch
a silent music,
a sunset unobserved.
A leaning tree,
is his bending fatigue or comfort?
Drink at my shadow, sleep at my feet,
lend me your dreams, of them I’ll take good care,
I will tuck you in with them, with a sparkle of my own.
Pink flowers blossoming down on your music,
warm air sweetly swirling,
bending, welcoming.
Give me back my time, my story, my life, my youth, my vigor,
all of which, everything and yet more again,
meant to be surrendered, to you.

Wondering In The Dark

The importance of a map

We might say a map is a representation of something else. A pirate’s map would represent an island or a strand, with a red X to mark the supposed location of the treasure chest. A navigation system in your phone, coupled with a map, performs a similar function in a much more refined and precise way; yet the principle is the same.

Which or what is the map of reality? Even better, allow me to ask: what reality really IS?

Such an ambitious query.

Let’s refer, for simplicity, just to the “mere” physical universe.
Armed with their senses, wits and guts, men and women advanced our collective knowledge of the portions of universe we can experience. The entire corpus of human knowledge, it’s actually another map. Or, as scientists would say, a model, or a series, structure, organism thereof.

They taught me that’s what science’s about. Observe, construct hypothesis, predictions, then craft experiments to verify them. Determine what’s true. And that is simply amazing, astonishing; just thinking about the technology involved in the creation and peruse of this article is staggering: the whole tech tree from the first tool ever made to telecommunication, microprocessors and whatnot… unbelievable.
And yet, something baffles me even more, or to better say, on another level or dimension. All that has ever been discovered, achieved and built… is based on a kind of a dream.
Not that is unreal, no. It’s the reality itself that poses a problem.
We achieve titanic feats, as well as menial tasks, by making use of an insanely complex technology (and ridiculously immense computational power), which exploits the measurable and predictable effects of this or that physical phenomenon.

What’s strange with this?
Let me quote Richard Feynman: “It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what energy IS.”

Even if scientific models get increasingly refined and become more and more precise or efficient, they are still – and always will be – models, or maps, of something else, something bigger, wider and fundamentally weird. The universe. Reality.

We aren’t able to grasp not even what energy is, one of the things we take for granted the most. We use it every day. We store it in batteries, extract it from many sources, understand that it equals mass times the squared speed of light; we literally breathe and metabolize it, we use it do write and display this article, we use it to think about the words in this article, and yet, no one knows exactly what it is, what it’s made of, its substance or nature.
We are familiar with its many manifestation – heat, electricity, movement or potential and so on – but those are all effects, symptoms of its working.

And what about time?

We don’t even agree on what space is.

We might bluntly reduce and approximate with this: you need not be a mechanic nor an engineer to drive your car. It works. That’s what matters for most people. But ultimately, it’s the act of wondering on the nature of things that allows mankind to shed some light on this or that aspect.

This light is nothing more than a matchstick burning in a dark cave at night. It’s all we have. And it is exhilarating.

So we keep wondering, wondering in the dark.


He has even put eternity in their heart; yet mankind will never find out the work that the true God has made from start to finish.” – Ecclesiastes 3: 11

Coffee Cold

There is a bar in my town… there are many, actually. Some of them are good, some of them I still think of as my own.
Cozy or trendy places, always watching a considerable amount of people coming and going every day.
Some are fancy, some are very humble. Many stories live in there, the owners or the workers like little mirrors in the afteroons of your days.
It’s a series of nice places, where so many ordinarily special things happen.
There is one thing they have in common. Other than the people (and a good story, of course).

The Coffee.

The Coffee, with a capital C, is an institution. Is something to respect, to admire, to know and discern, to enjoy with awareness, being it gobbled down avidly or slowly, sensuosly sipped.
The coffee is important around here.

Every barista who is at least a little proud of his trade, boasts in his coffee-making skills. It’s a technique, yet it’s more than that, it’s an art.

Don’t be fooled by this general mood of connoisseurism, though.
Only few selected places can provide the Coffee with the capital C.
There’s a huge literature about this, I’m sure, as well as an oral tradition. A feather in the cap of that silly nation I happen to be from.
So I won’t be verbose about this.

Oh, did I mention that the one and only Coffee is the Espresso? Silly me, it still feels obvious to me.

Of course there is Cappuccino, Caffè Macchiato, Latte Macchiato, Caffelatte, even Marocchino, Ginseng, and so on, you name it.
But when you say “let’s go get a coffee”, there is one thing in the mind of the bystanders: the fabled ceramic little cup with just enough of that precious, slightly foamy, smoking fluid which we use to call, once again, “Coffee”.

And the smell? The smell of roasting coffee beans is legendary. But I’m digressing.

I have a thing for ceramic cups, you know?
There is a specific thickness that grants the best results when enjoying an espresso.
Most people ignore the reasons, but it has to do with thermal inertia and conductivity, respectively.
And to think that there is a whole category of persons who require to have an espresso “al vetro” – to the glass, namely, in a little glass. Blasphemy.

The very very vast majority uses to put sugar in it, and not just a little sometimes. The purists, like I myself a little am, train themselves to take it black. To taste it entirely, completely, with no adulteration, in all its precious and glorious aroma.

Then, there is the rule of the 3 Cs, which I cannot quote nor translate adequately, three words starting with c that can be roughly translated as the 3 Hs: “Hell, How Hot!”

A proper coffee shouldn’t have time to cool off at all. It wouldn’t be strange if, say you forget to drink it distracted by something else, the barista would silently take it back, throw it away, then brew another one when you’re ready.

Even in summer, when it’s sunny and hot, espressos would still be served, and consumed, piping hot.

There is an exception though.
And here you can imagine the curve on a cartesian plane, with temperature of the coffee on the y axis and air temperature on the x. It would resemble a step, slightly rounded. A discreet switching between two polarities.
The fancy “caffè freddo” – cold coffee, where cool is meant as ice-cool (or at least fridge-cool).
In other words, you go from a hot espresso in almost any circumstances, to a cool refreshing, lighter but longer cold coffee in the hottest days of the year (which to me correspond to the whole summer, rounding upwards).
The baristas use to prepare big bottles of this concoction, using long espresso, or coffee and water, or ice, and sugar, shaking it all, and leaving it chilling in the fridge.
It’s like a second class coffee. Made for when you don’t have the guts to handle a proper Espresso.
I enjoy it though.

Of course it doesn’t exist here. There is no reason to, after all.

But the room temperature coffee, from where I am from, is a blasphemy everyone agrees to condemn. Ceramic guys like me, glass people, fancy macchiato people, spiked coffee users, vegans and flat-earthers: probably even toddlers are disgusted at the thought.

Then, another image comes to my mind.
Afternoon, lazy afternoon or an ordinary warm day.
Parents taking the proverbial after lunch nap. For some reason you are awake, and roaming the house.
Maybe it’s the silence, the quiet. The cat is sleeping too on the kitchen chair, right in that spot where the risk of being stroked is minimized, and where she can better intercept the feeble draft coming from the window open wide.
The sun hits the sun shade on the balcony, its power very poorly restrained by the dark fabric.
Items from the lunch have remained on the table. You haven’t carried out completely (yet) the chore assigned to you by your mother.
The table cloth with random breadcrumbs on it. A glass, a couple of dirty paper napkins. A rounded knife. The empty bottle of wine. The butt of the salami you almost finished.

More stuff is on the stove and the kitchen counter. It bothers you, seeing it, and you don’t know if it more or less so than the thought of it.
The coffee machine is there too, with its funny, indifferent stance. Black elbow on the hip, metal chin up.
You don’t like moka coffee very much. (There’s only one Coffee, with a capital c… The words start flowing in your head once again).
But you know, coffee is always coffee after all, and where’s no espresso maker, a moka can make your day.
Before rinsing it (NEVER wash a moka!) and putting it away, you open the lid.
There is still some coffee there.

Room temperature, summer, hazy, dazey coffee.

And it’s just perfect.

Life of a drop

One in many.

Tiny, suspended, unbeknownst.

Awaking from a dream, rising from the vast dark.

One between many. Countless, in all directions. Apparently identical.

Together, we are the cloud. Shapeless, unbound, yet defined.

I am one, I am many, I am one and only, and alone.

The wind is my horse, carrying me and shaping us.

I watch little things from afar, and gaze at the immense up above, suspended in between worlds, dream and reality, earth and sky, life and death.

I roam seemingly without a destination, a constant permutation. I gather the thoughts of men and shape their fantasies.

Who decides when the time comes? What triggers the inescapable? Unfathomable chain of events.

We encounter our fate in a moment. We collapse as one, remembering we have weight too. Unescapable, frightening, exciting, dreadful, joyful, life bringer, devastating, warm, cold.

In that moment verticality becomes my nature. Gravity is a tight steel rope flinging me down. I stretch, embodying dynamics.

You cannot see me coming, yet you cannot ignore me. We are everywhere, filling the air, thousand needles unsuccesfully trying to pierce the world.

I fall for an eternity, my time marked by the lightning. An alien landscape, my next destination, another life, another step in this perpetual cycle of death and rebirth.

Buildings, roads, traffic lights, people, animals, grass, rocks, even umbrellas. Suddenly, we are everywhere. We coat everything in every direction, we seep through, we impregnate.

We sing as a choir. We sing to a secret music only few can discern. And even fewer dance to it.

The Reality Language

Galileo Galilei said that ‘Both the Holy Scriptures and nature proceed from the Divine Word ‘.

Galileo was a great scholar of the Bible as well as of nature. He came to understand things about God and his prophecies as very few others did for a long time before (and much later) his era.

In contrast to the myopic and authoritarian position of the clergy, Galileo sincerely investigated the fields of knowledge accessible to him, placing faith in the Bible as inspired by God’s word (and therefore truth) and in science as a cognitive tool of material reality. In accordance with this, those who today study the Bible with humility and sincerity, discover that it is never in contrast with true science (on the other hand, dogmas of false religion are today and have been in the past, because they are not based on ‘the Holy Scriptures’).

The thing that struck me about the sentence reported at the beginning, however, was the concept, very simple indeed and if we want to be obvious (Occam), that the information contained in the Bible and nature come from the same source.

We often mention the writing of Isaiah 40:26 to affirm that God is the source of energy, and therefore of everything that surrounds us (matter = energy), and this also agrees with the idea of ​​a “Big Bang” thought as an unimaginable “ignition” of energy that develops in the universe and all that it contains.

But I like to dwell on thinking that, given that all the energy (and matter) existing in the universe is not prey to chaos but follows a cloud of very precise physical laws (even if they are not all known yet, and it seems that not never will be), it becomes clear that Jehovah God is the source of information . Everything around us can be thought of in terms of energy configured according to certain parameters. It is easy for me to make a comparison with an immense software: every particle, each quantum, could be represented as a variable of an infinite weaving of equations programmed to support the material existence , fed by the spirit of God (energy, dynamics).

Natural laws, so to speak, assume the value of “divine programming language” .


Now, what does the Bible have to do with this? Galileo, in the quote above, does nothing but declare his agreement with 2 Timothy 3:16, which tells us that the Holy Scriptures (all those belonging to the biblical canon, and not just some, nor others) are inspired or breathed by God. Galileo also confirmed the need for the information contained in the Bible in order to have a notion of what cannot be investigated with material means. The information contained in the Bible comes from a higher level tan that in which the physical universe resides.

In a nutshell, through the Bible God speaks to us of truth that we cannot see with our eyes. There are many things that we cannot see with the naked eye, but spiritual things are not visible even with the aid of technological tools: they can become only with instruments of the corresponding and right nature, that is spiritual. The Holy Scriptures are the container of this benign gift that the Creator has given us.

Zephaniah 3:9 speaks of it: For then I will change the language of the peoples to a pure language, So that all of them may call on the name of Jehovah, To serve him shoulder to shoulder. this pure language, and to enjoy a supranational brotherhood. Whoever serves Jehovah knows this well. This pure language is not a spoken language, but is the truth about God and his purposes, contained in the Bible. Why does this make it possible to “serve shoulder to shoulder”? Is not the purpose of all religions, in theory?

Many make the mistake, conditioned by the culture of Christianity, of thinking that the Bible or religion must be a series of rules such as “do” and “not do”, detailed in an age different from ours and therefore having a validity that has now lapsed if not at all, at least in good part.

That is not the case.

Jehovah invites us to know and study his word for this reason. The sincere and humble scholar (like Galileo) will be able to learn this “pure language”: the values, the way of thinking of God. As in learning a new language it is not enough to memorize the words, but it is necessary to acquire a new way of thinking, new mental patterns, the same is true when we begin to learn “pure language”. This language comes from the source of information, from above, and is therefore something unique and superior to any other human notion.

Hebrews 4:12 tells us that For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints from the marrow, and is able to discern thoughts and intentions of the heart. A simple book could not do this. Instead, a book that contains the thought of God, can. And it does.

Beyond the style with which human writers physically composed the writings that went to make up the Bible, the information that lurks within their words (they were inspired or guided by God) is of a higher order, and logically is not linked to the language (and related sounds) in which the manuscripts were composed or still translated.

The Bible is the only valid guide for man because it was written for us by the Creator of all things; it resonates in reality . Whether we can understand it or not, we are able to live in one reality, and the rules behind its working do not depend on our will. We can choose whether to abide them or ignore them, but they persist independently of our choices; they existed before the individual and will continue to do so even afterwards. These rules, laws, principles, are immaterial and as mentioned before they represent the “programming language” or code with which Jehovah God has produced this reality.

Man has experimented with and analyzed some of these laws, and by acquiring a certain degree of knowledge he has produced a certain technology. But man has chosen to do another experiment, which affects us all. He decided to ignore the principles that God has given to living beings with a conscience and intelligence, endowed with free will.

If you have followed me here with this reasoning, it is clear that a “programmer”, or better, a creator, establishes from the beginning what should happen within the system he devised and what would be harmful for it instead.

This is called establishing what is good and what is bad.

The world is permeated by the crazy idea that man can decide for himself on this. Moreover, it is the (universal) issue on this point that generated the situation in which we are now (see Genesis 3: 5 ).

Many object that the free will of the individual is not compatible with the moral values ​​established by someone else. Good: think of any physical law. Example: free will cannot prevent you from getting your hands into the fire. But the simple will does not allow us to escape the consequences: no matter what, you burn yourself. [It is useless to bring up arguments like “but what if I wore asbestos gloves – but what if I invented an entropy-clearing field – but what if donkeys could fly” because any invention or material product is still based on the rules and protocols of the physical universe. The act of ignoring a physical law is not achieved by exploiting another, but only by being above, outside, the universe system. The programmer can alter any variable at will, he has the power and authority (and he also knows what he’s doing); small entities inside the running software can’t do that.]

So besides talking about spiritual things, the Bible contains the only real message .

The Word of God is living.

(the)EVIL inside

The struggle

Ephesians 6:12 – because we have a struggle, not against blood and flesh, but against the governments, against the authorities, against the world rulers of this darkness, against the wicked spirit forces in the heavenly places.

The most evident part of this struggle is in front of us every day, with every wicked influence, pressure, temptation or trial we face in Satan’s world.

There is another danger though, represented by another kind of warfare. In the wars of this world attacks are both physical and cyber; the same it’s true for the spiritual war. We have to face attacks that leverage our imperfect nature, and that seem coming from the inside of us. They are dangerous because it’s often hard to detect them.

Of course among these there would be impure thoughts or negative thoughts about our brothers and sister or even the organisation. As if these kind of thoughts weren’t treacherous enough, there is still another variety of mental attacks we want to defend ourselves from.

Consience

1 John 3:20 – regarding whatever our hearts may condemn us in, because God is greater than our hearts and knows all things

Consience is a precious gift. If we keep it trained, it will allow to stick to Jehovah’s will. We must not take it for granted though, and remember that we are still imperfect. So our conscience is too: often the heart tries to justify its own wrong desires, but sometimes it can condemn ourselves.

We may found ourselves, even on daily basis, questioning our own motives, trying to “unmask” the wrongdoer in us, because we know how much imperfect we are, how easily misled and temptable, how many are how weaknesses. We may repeatedly point at the worst in us as the most important part of us, building and ever increasing sense of guilt and self-disrespect. We end up deprived of energy and of joy in serving Jehovah.

Is this the true work of a christian consience? Doesn’t this hypercritical spirit remind us of someone?

Accuser

Job 1:9 – At that Satan answered Jehovah: “Is it for nothing that Job has feared God?

Revelation 12:9-10 – So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him. I heard a loud voice in heaven say: “Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the Kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!

2 Corinthians 11:14 – And no wonder, for Satan himself keeps disguising himself as an angel of light.

Yes, we may found ourselves doing the work of Satan, recreating his attitude inside of ourselves! This is an appalling prospect indeed! Yet it’s what we imperfect humans could tend to do, even without realising it. We said at the start we want and must fight Satan and his propaganda and his spirit, so it’s just natural we should fight this tendency as well.

Victory

2 Corintians 10:3-5 – For though we walk in the flesh, we do not wage warfare according to what we are in the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not fleshly, but powerful by God for overturning strongly entrenched things. For we are overturning reasonings and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are bringing every thought into captivity to make it obedient to the Christ

Psalms 94:19 – When anxieties (or: disquieting thoughts) overwhelmed me, You comforted and soothed me.

To win this mental fight, we must internalize Jehovah’s way of thinking and feeling, meditating on his word, finding verses and principles that guide our mind in the right direction. Like with computers, we could want to install an antivirus program in our mind, trying to actively intercept harmful or negative thoughts during the day. We may have to examine every single thought we make to see if it matches Jehovah’s principles and requirements. This requires a constant effort: I’m not talking about the thoughts we know are wrong, but about the non-suspicious looking ones.

But sure it’s worth it: with exercise, it will become less hard. We will feel much more joy and we will be able to serve Jehovah “with all our minds”.

Hierarchy of the protocols of Creation

Some premises:

– the physical universe is entirely constituted, ultimately, by energy (matter E = mc², dark matter, various forms of manifestation of energy, dark energy). Moreover, matter is mostly empty space, from this we observe that the solidity and materiality that can be experienced with the senses are actually an illusion. I conclude that the universe is more like software than anything else: information encoded and conveyed by energy. The source of all energy is Jehovah, the great architect of everything that exists and becomes.

– Jehovah God is the Eternal, has neither end nor beginning. We have read the illustration about the lines with positive and negative numbers saying that the existence of God extends to infinity in both directions, but this does not satisfy us fully. Even if we cannot completely understand certain things, on the book All Scripture we find something more. Among many interesting things, I quote: “Jehovah himself lives in eternity. As for his creatures, he was pleased to place them over time. The angels of heaven, even the rebellious Satan, are fully aware of the passage of time. “ That is, for all God’s creatures, the temporal protocol is valid, He alone is exempt. Since time itself is defined as the consequence of change, or the fruit of becoming, and that the meaning of the name of God has directly to do with it, we could imagine time as a consequence of God’s actions, or as something that He emanates.

– space and time are essential between them. Curiously, even if we take them for granted, the very definitions of what time is and what space is (see encyclopedias) are not univocal and absolute, but relative and multiple (and unsatisfactory). Evidently, as in the case of energy (of which we can only observe the effects), it can be an infrastructure, a protocol, so fundamental in the nature of the universe, that we can only experience some aspects of it. I will call it a space-time protocol , as the experimental evidence so far apparently shows that space and time are one.

Now I am not a physicist, nor an astrophysicist, nor something similar, but I wonder: is it possible that this space-time protocol is not limited to the physical universe? Could it not be something, a larger infrastructure within which our universe is located? This would at least explain how spiritual creatures other than God are subject to time and interact in “our” spacetime in certain ways. That is, time could have begun with the first creation of God, which is not the Big Bang but the creation of Jesus as the first-born son.

And, given that time and space are part of the same protocol, we could imagine a sort of spiritual space, indeed this is necessary: ​​obviously not a three-dimensional geometric space. If it is true that the protocol is space-time it is also true that it is not a physical object or something tangible, but rather a set of rules or laws within which the events of that “place” occur (place not intended as a space; the example of software returns: a network protocol is not something solid, but a system that manages traffic and data processing within the site, the network, in which it operates). And many events occur in the spiritual realm, and they must have an unimaginable complexity for us …

And all this leads me to think that the Protocols of Creation operate in a cascade (see OSI ); that from every level one can freely access all the lower ones, but none of the superiors. Similarly, that every valid protocol in a level is valid in all the underlying ones, but not necessarily in the above ones. Examples: time (or spacetime) is valid for all but one, and matter applies to the physical universe but not to the spiritual one …

What do you think?

Life Pattern

Still talk about what are not my subjects of specialization. But let us try to be guided by the Scriptures in the first place, then by the Knowledge in a broad sense and finally by common sense.

What makes us ourselves? Not what characterizes us, but what the I  is? Which protocol, which rule, in which region of creation does the information that identifies a single individual reside?

Reflection arises from the discourses on the resurrection. In a strictly material sense, resurrection is impossible. Much literature and even cinematography have addressed the topic. The premises are the following:

– to make us what we are would be: personality, memories, tastes, DNA. If it were only bout this, let’s assume that: you had the right technology or that carrying out the operation was a “superior entity” – then it would be enough to clone a person, or to get a body with the same DNA, to program it as a computer with the same memories and to give it the same inclinations and voila … an individual indistinguishable from the original. And not only that, he will also be firmly convinced that he is the original. (Does Blade Runner tell you anything?)

The fact that it cannot be like that is demonstrated by the following observations: homozygotic twins have the same DNA but are two different people; if I lose my memory, I would always be “ME”; if I suffer a trauma and change my personality,  the same; finally, even tastes and inclinations generally change over time. So? How do we place faith in the resurrection? To be sure that whoever is resurrected will be the same person and not another one?

So far I have found a single and incontrovertible guarantee that proves that resurrection is possible (of course God is omnipotent … but let us remember Hebrews 11: 1). And this guarantee is the life of Jesus. Not only his own resurrection, but what perhaps even more … words are missing … wonderful, incomprehensible, unfathomable, is the passage from immense spiritual creature to … embryo!

Yes, an embryo has its DNA, but what else does it have? As alive as he is, he has no mind, no brain, no thoughts. It has no language, it has no body, it is only a cell: DNA, membrane, etc. …! What’s in common, linking a cell and the most powerful of spiritual creatures? Where was the I of Jesus who passed from one state to another, and who certainly was always him?

Evidently, although there is no immortal soul, there must be something invisible that characterizes every single individual. A protocol of a spiritual nature, precisely, which places us on the level of existence, regardless of what state or position we assume within the material space-time … or even the spiritual one, so that both Jesus and the anointed pass from human life to the heavenly one!

And now I come to explain the title. In the Watchtower of March 15, 2006, the following was reported:

“Jehovah God, who has a perfect memory, has no difficulty remembering the life pattern of those who have died. (Isaiah 40:26) Having originated life, Jehovah can easily bring the same person back to life in a new body. (Psalm 36: 9) “

What is this life pattern?  (In the Italian magazine translated as “life model”) It can be translated, depending on the context, also with drawing, model, diagram, recurring pattern, repetitive structure.

So our “life” (in the sense of self and not of historical experience) has to have a different pattern, a “signature” for each of us; something that is generated once and is active or “ignites” when we receive energy from Jehovah (at conception or at creation or resurrection). We can imagine it graphically, but who knows what it looks like in the eyes of our wise and loving Creator!

And here is how He can give us life as many times as He wants and in whatever form or body He wants, without affecting our “I”!

learn UV mapping in 8 hours

Such a catchy title, yet it is not an advertising. More of a personal experience.

As an architectural renderer, I’ve been acquainted with the concept of uv mapping for several years now. But i never actually delved into it – up until last week.

I received a proposal, an invitation, to submit a test job. The task was to model an object, then create physical-based-rendering textures, then map the texture to the model, export the finished product. Nice and neat. Or so it has seemed to me.

The major challenge: how on earth am I supposed to map a texture in a SketchUp model? What exactly do they mean by PBR workflow? And what’s all this fuss about quads, n-gons, triangles?

The truth is I have always been aware of such issues, and that sooner or later i would have faced the moment when I would have been “forced” to deal with all this stuff. That is one reason I accepted the challenge.

Long story short, let’s break up the work in phases (links below as footnotes):

Step 1 – Love your QUADS

The average SketchUp user does not bother much about quads. And it is not a coincidence. If you actually want to SEE them, or even work with them you will need QuadFace Tools, a free extension. Nice tool, quite simple to learn and use. Enough video tutorials to teach you on YouTube. A couple of hours or so, and you should be able to produce your first quad-based works. So far, so good.

Step 2 – PBR doesn’t stand for PoopButtRigging

There would be so much to say about physics based rendering and material, and as a fan of MaxwellRender I could go on for quite a long time. I spare you, feel free to search around.

Just be aware that is more of a workflow than a specific tool or software. Yes, you will stumble upon Unity and Substance Painter as well, and for good reasons too. But once understood the principles behind the PBR maps (BaseColor/Diffuse, AmbientOcclusion, NormalMap, HeightMap/Roughness) you shall realize that with some work you can get out of Gimp what you need. (Just remember to install the normal map plugin, again, free).

Step 3 – The hardest part. UV mapping is not to be joked about

Sad but true: SketchUp won’t let you directly UV-map anything per-se. You need another plugin. This time I used the one-week trial version of WrapR, a nice plugin made specifically for SketchUp. But you can obtain the same results with a very slightly different workflow using the free software Roadkill. Again, nice video tutorials, lots of people helping us out here. Thank you, by the way. After some 3-4 hours, you should be able to do you first and barely satisfying UV map of your model (given that it is your first try, like mine).

The last step – a sad conclusion (?)

The file was supposed to be delivered in a .fbx format. After all the effort and the work, I discovered that is not possible to directly export to this format from SketchUp. One more proof that the entire workflow was thought with 3dStudio in mind. Besides of this, it has been a really learning experience.

I do not have anything against a specific tool or software. But I actually do have a LOT against forcing people to use specific software rather than the ones they are familiar with. Even more if such software is heavy to run, costly, and made by huge software houses.

Power to the Open Source. Do your part and share with me in the fight for the freedom of software and workflow choice and interchangeability of formats. Woe to proprietary formats!


LINKS:

Work with quads in SketchUp – QuadFace Tools

Download Gimp, just do it please.  And the Normal Map plugin here.

UV mapping – Roadkill

You may also be interested in WrapR, SketchUv and a number of other tools which I am to lazy to list now.